Analysis Of The LEGO Ninjago Movie - 880 Words

At one time, Everything (Was) Awesome!!! Remember that? The genius 2-minute earworm of a song that The Lonely Island and Tegan Sara took all the way to the Oscars as an Original Song nominee? The beauty of framing your film around an absurd, empty, but undeniably catchy song is that the movie matched the pace of the song. Hearing it, we laugh, instantly tap our feet, and directors Phil Lord Christopher Miller established a cadence with which their film could bounce to. If The LEGO Movie established rhythm among the hundreds of comedic puns, jokes, and visual sight gags, it also retained a fearlessness about it that was absolutely invigorating. Voiceover cameos and LEGO-inspired creations of dozens of famous people carried the†¦show more content†¦Understandable sure, but Lloyd has five other ninja-skilled friends, which is not really a common trait for kids who are mocked and bullied everyday at school. But I digress. Buoyed by nine different individuals credited on the screenplay (NINE!), the movie stumbles around trying to recreate the magic of the prior movies. The returns are middling at best, though one villain who arrives midway through the film is hilarious, and rather cleverly crashes the real world into the plastic and synthetic world these characters inhabit. Additionally, the movie employs a strong list of talented performers and relegates them to minimal, or nominal, character development and dialogue. Since the movie is primarily tied to the story of Lloyd and his megalomaniac father, and features Jackie Chan as a LEGO sensei who mentors the teenage ninjas, and serves as the wise old man who tells a young child about the story we are preparing to see, there isnt much room left for anyone else. And so Kumail Nanjiani, Michael Pena, Abbi Jacobson, Zach Woods, and Fred Armisen may fill out the card of additional ninja team members, but because the movie has no interest in letting their characters have space to mean anything, The LEGO Ninjago Movie folks seem to have hired them for name-on-poster recognition, as opposed to anything memorable or significant. Though this may all feel like a harsh critique, there areShow MoreRelatedRationale Lego Groups Products After careful review of the LEGO Group website and the merchandise2000 Words   |  8 PagesRationale Lego Groups Products After careful review of the LEGO Group website and the merchandise sold in stores, it is apparent that the LEGO Group offers a plethora of products for children to enjoy. To sum up a few, there are such products as the popular LEGO City which introduces children to their everyday environment from building Airport terminals and Fire Emergency stations. LEGO Creator lets you build three different items such as a cat, rabbit and a puppy, using all the same LEGO’s in

Is Proof Needed in Order for God to Exist Free Essays

string(98) " is that which nothing greater can be conceived, the idea of God must exist, if only in the mind\." Is Proof Needed in Order for God to Exist At some point in life every person may question the existence of god. This could happen for a number of reasons. For example when we see bad things that occur around the world we may lose our faith or wonder why does god allow these things to happen? As humans we all have a natural instinct to find answers to things that we ourselves cannot explain or understand. We will write a custom essay sample on Is Proof Needed in Order for God to Exist or any similar topic only for you Order Now Philosophers have spent a great amount of time trying to prove or disapprove the existence of god, but do we really need proof that god exist? This is a tough question to answer because there are people that would say yes and people that would say no. I myself have never questioned the existence of god due to the fact that I feel like the proof of his existence is all around us. In this paper I will discuss the two sides of this debut and which side makes the most valid argument for my personal beliefs. When you ask someone why they believe in something most likely it is because they have facts or some type of evidence as to why they believe what they do. If I say my dog bites and show you my arm with bite marks then you are more likely to believe that my statement is true. The same thoughts can be applied to the way some people believe and do not believe in god. Some people believe because they have faith in the bible and that something more powerful than any other force had to create all the living things on earth. Others believe that everything in that is on earth could have evolved through science and therefore none of the creations on earth are proof that god exist, these people are often referred to as atheist. When people think about an atheist they usually think that they worship the devil or are into some type of satanic worship, but this is not the case. Simply put atheists just do not believe in god and they believe that science played a part in the creation of the world and the things on it. The issue is why do we need proof that god exist and what type of proof is needed to prove his existence? Many people, including Christians, wonder what proof is there that God exist. Is there really any concrete evidence to prove that an all-powerful creator exists? Or are we all being blinded by our faith and believing in something that may or may not be real, just so that we have hope that life is better after death. It is hard to imagine something that has always xisted, because as human all we know is life and death. To understand something that never began and will never end is hard to wrap our brains around that concept. If a person oppose the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence presented can be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have seen ghost or spirits, then no amount of information is going to change their thinking. There are photographs of ghost and spirits, personal interviews from people who have encountered these beings, and even special equipment that can pick up various activities from these beings. Although this may be enough evidence for most people to some all this evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that ghost or spirits do not exist. Of course many have tried to prove God’s existence with rational arguments. Aquinas, Abelard, Anselm, Pascal, and Paley are a few that have attempted this. These approaches are of limited helpfulness, for though we can approach God with our reason and detect Him in nature, he cannot be fully grasped in this way. More importantly, these logical proofs for God’s existence miss the point. What is the point? In my experience, most of those who doubt or deny God’s existence do not do so because of firmly held philosophical convictions. They do so because of personal disappointment with God. Furthermore, I’m suggesting that many of those who now perceive themselves as doubting or denying God for philosophical reasons, got where they are because they became personally disillusioned with God sometime in the past. To answer the question, ‘Does God Exist? ‘, a number of studies, articles, and research papers have been written. Two arguments that best attempt to prove the existence of God are the ontological argument by St. Anselm, and the cosmological argument by St. Thomas Aquinas. The second out of the five arguments provided in the cosmological argument is based on experience and efficient cause. The efficient cause makes something happen, i. e. cause and effect, and this are the premises for his argument. Aquinas argues that nothing in this world can originate on its own, and must have a first cause to create an intermediate cause, to create an ultimate cause and effect. Infinity makes it impossible to have a first efficient cause, but if there is no first cause, there would be no intermediate cause, and we would not exist. In the ontological argument, St Anselm provides an argument that is based on logic. In order to understand his argument you must first admit that, if there is a God, he is that than which nothing greater can be conceived. This is the premise for his argument. Without this premises his argument would fail. It must be agreed to, because it is a true statement. You do not have to believe in God in order to agree to these Premises. In agreeing to these first premises, St Anselm forces you to admit that God does exist in reality because his premises support his conclusion. St. Anselm’s Theory is that if God is that which nothing greater can be conceived, the idea of God must exist, if only in the mind. You read "Is Proof Needed in Order for God to Exist" in category "Essay examples" To exist in reality is greater than existing in the mind. Therefore God, being that which nothing greater can be conceived must exist in reality. All his premises support his conclusion, creating a valid and sound argument proving that God must exist. St. Anselm’s first form of the argument is that God is â€Å"that than which none greater can be conceived†. This means that no one can think of anything that is greater than God. The second idea is, it is greater to exist than not to exist. Next, St. Anselm describes two kinds of existence: existence in the mind, and existence in real. Existence in the reality is very easy to believe, if you can touch, see, smell, hear, or taste something, in reality it exists. Existence in mind is harder to understand for some, because many people only believe what they see. Finally, St. Anselm defined God as the greatest being possible. A being who fails to exist is less perfect than a being that exist. Therefore, God must exist, necessarily. If the greatest thing that we can conceive does not exist than we can still conceive the greatest thing that does exist, and that would be God. Philosophers, whether they are atheists, or believers have always been eager to discuss the existence of God. Some philosophers, such as St Anselm, and Rene Descartes, that formulated the ontological arguments attempt to prove God’s existence, believe that we have proven that God exist through our senses, logic, and experiences. Ontological† literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. Ontological arguments all have ways to prove the existence of God. This argument is very important for religious believers, but has come under criticism from those who do not believe; because they say that it is flawed. Immanuel Kant feels that we will never have the answer to this ques tion due to our human limitations, and reason. Every painting has a painter and for every book there is a writer. The same can be said about the creation of our world. Our world could not have just created itself. Thomas Aquinas, a Catholic Dominican monk, more clearly proves this point with the First Cause argument. In this argument he says that there is a cause for everything but there cannot be an infinite amount of causes. There could only be a first, the intermediate, and then the last cause. This argument is very true and if God did not exist as the uncaused first cause then nothing else would make sense. The first and second premise is true because based on experience things are made or moved and things don’t just appear out of thin air. The third premise is also true because at some point in time something had to be put in motion and there cannot just be an endless stream of causes. If God was taken out of the causes then we wouldn’t exist here today. Many still argue that neither one of these arguments prove Gods existence, because it is impossible for our reason to accept them. In Soren Kierkegaard’s argument, â€Å"Faith, not Logic is The Basis of Belief; he argues that it is impossible to prove Gods existence because it is beyond our reason as human beings to do so. Kierkegaard classifies the word God under the word unknown. It is impossible for reason to know the unknown, so it is impossible to know, or prove God exists. Kierkegaard also claims that reason on its own does not attempt to prove God exists, he claims that it would be foolish to do so. It would be foolish to do so because reason is from existence, not towards it. Therefore if God does not exist, it would be impossible to prove he does, and if God does exist, because of our worldly limitations, it would be impossible to justify it as truth. Kierkegaard claims that the only way to argue Gods existence would be to assume Gods existence before creating the argument. In having faith, you have knowledge on what God should be like in order to fill the Gap of the unknown with ideas about God. Having Faith would make reason understand God. Doubt exists in the believer and the non-believer because it is beyond our reason to determine the truth of God’s existence. The Big Bang Theory generally refers to the idea that the universe has expanded from a hot and dense condition at some time in the past, and continues to expand to this day. My question is what put it there? Time could have not decided to one day say, â€Å"I think I’m going to create life in a thing called a universe. † And magically particles come out of nowhere, more and more build up until it’s screaming hot, and then BANG! Time begins and so does everything as we know it today. Something had to place it there. Something had to have planned out the whole process. Everything is too complex and precise to not have been created by an intelligent being. From beginning to present time billions of people from all around the world have believed and been convinced in the existence of a god. There are various forms of evidence displaying the belief of a god throughout history including biblical carvings, artistic creations, religious and political conflicts, traditions, architect and the creation of the bible itself. Could one say with any sense of confidence that the shared concept of the beliefs and actions of so many people living in different times with different realities be mistaken? It is extraordinary how despite the many different languages, customs, cultures, values, and lifestyles, the belief in God or a higher power is one of the few things that can unify all people. This is strong evidence contributing to mine and many others faith in the existence of God. The existence of god is something that has puzzled millions of people around the world. It tears families apart, and brings some together. There are a lot of arguments supporting the existence of god, but just as many denying the fact that he or it exists. Agnosticism is something that many people go by because it allows your mind to explore and assist you in deciding whether or not a deity exists. You need to find the answers within yourself because only you can determine what truth and reality is. Not all questions may be answered, but it will allow you to form a true and concise belief. You cannot depend on someone or something else to satisfy your questions. You only live once and must search for the knowledge you desire. Some people are destined to succeed, and others are determined to succeed. If you seek the truth, you will find it. Logan, I. (2007). Whatever Happened to Kant’s Ontological Argument?. Philosophy Phenomenological Research, 74(2), 346-363. doi:10. 1111/j. 1933-1592. 2007. 00021. x McCarthy-Jones, S. (2011). Seeing the unseen, hearing the unsaid: hallucinations, psychology and St Thomas Aquinas. Mental Health, Religion Culture, 14(4), 353-369. doi:10. 1080/13674671003745870 Mikolajczak, M. (2004). Is there proof for the existence of God?. National Catholic Reporter, 40(43), 5a Morse, D. R. (2011, October). God’s Existence: Proof. Journal of Spirituality Paranormal Studies. p. 181. Schumacher, L. (2011). THE LOST LEGACY OF ANSELM’S ARGUMENT: RE-THINKING THE PURPOSE OF PROOFS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. Modern Theology, 27(1), 87-101. doi:10. 1111/j. 1468-0025. 2010. 01656. x How to cite Is Proof Needed in Order for God to Exist, Essay examples

Registered nursing Essay Example For Students

Registered nursing Essay The practice of nursing by a registered nurse is defined as the process of diagnosing human responses to actual or potential health problems, providing supportive and restorative care, health counseling and teaching, case finding and referral, collaborating the implementation of the total health care regimen and executing the medical regimen under the direction of a licensed physician or dentist. Advanced nursing practice is defined as the performance of advanced level nursing practice activities which, by virtue of post-basic education and experience, are appropriate to and may be performed by an advanced practice registered nurse. The advanced practice registered nurse performs acts of diagnosis and treatment of alterations in health status, as described in subsection of this section. The advanced practice registered nurse may, under the direction of a physician licensed to practice medicine in this state and in accordance with written prescriptions, and if practicing in an institu tion licensed pursuant to subsection as a hospital, home for the aged, health care facility for the handicapped, nursing home, rest home, mental health facility, the maintained by any state agency and providing services for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment or care of human health conditions, or an industrial health facility licensed pursuant to subsection which serves at least two thousand employees, or a clinic operated by a state agency, municipality, or private nonprofit corporation, or clinic operated by any educational institution prescribed by regulations prescribe, dispense, and administer medical therapeutics and corrective measures, except that an advanced practice registered nurse licensed pursuant to maintaining current certification from the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists who is prescribing and administering medical therapeutics during surgery may only do so if the physician who is medically directing the prescriptive activity is physically present in the institution, clinic, or other setting where such surgery is being performed. In all other settings, the advanced practice registered nurse may, under the direction of a physician licensed to practice medicine in the state and in accordance with written protocol, prescribe and administer medical therapeutics and corrective measures and may dispense drugs in the form of professional samples in accordance. The practice of nursing by a licensed practical nurse is defined as the performing of selected tasks and sharing of responsibility under the direction of a registered nurse or an advanced practice registered nurse and within the framework of supportive and restorative care, health counseling and teaching, case finding and referral, collaborating in the implementation of the total health care regimen and executing the medical regimen under the direction of a licensed physician or dentist. In the case of a registered or licensed practical nurse employed by a home health care agency, the practice of nursing includs executing the medical regimen under the direction of a physician licensed. A graduate nurse who has received such certificate of registration shall be known as a Registered Nurse and no other person shall assume such title or use the abbreviation R.N. or any other words, letters or figures which indicate that the person using the same is a trained, certified, graduate or registered nurse. Prescription forms used by advanced practice registered. All prescription forms used by advanced practice registered nurses and nurse-midwives shall contain the name, address and telephone number of the physician under whose direction the advanced practice registered nurse is prescribing or with whom the nurse-midwife has a clinical practice relationship. Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude such form from also containing the name of the advanced practice registered nurse or nurse-midwife. Licensure as advanced practice registered nurse. The department of public health and addiction services may issue an advanced practice registered nurse license to a per son seeking to perform the activities described in subsection of section 20-87a, as amended by section 1 of this act, upon receipt of a fee of one hundred dollars, to an applicant who satisfies the following requirements is eligible for registered nurse licensure in this state, as provided by section 20-93 or 20-holds and maintains current certification as either a nurse practitioner, a clinical nurse specialist, or a nurse anesthetist from one of the following national certifying bodies which certify nurses in advanced practice: The American Nurses Association, the Nurses Association of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Certification Corporation, the Nation Board of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners and Associates or the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists; has completed thirty hours of education in pharmacology for advanced nursing practice; and if first certified by one of the foregoing certifying bodies after you, hold a masters degree in nursing or in a related field recognized for certification as either a nurse practitioner, a clinical nurse specialist, or a nurse anesthetist by one of the foregoing certifying bodies. No license shall be issued under this section to any applicant against whom professional disciplinary action is pending or who is the subject of an unresolved complaint. During the period commencing, the department of public health and addiction services may in its discretion allow a registered nurse, who has been practicing as an advanced practice registered nurse in a nurse practitioner role and who is unable to obtain certification as nurse practitioner by one of the national certifying bodies specified in subsection (a) of this section, to be licensed as an advanced practice registered nurse provided the individual: 1. Holds a current Connecticut license as a register nurse pursuant to this chapter; 2. Presents the department with documentation of the reasons one of such national certifying bodies will not cert ify him as a nurse practitioner; 3. Has been in active practice as a nurse practitioner for at least five years in a facility licensed pursuant to section 19a-491; 4. Provides the department with documentation of his preparation as a nurse practitioner; 5. Provides the department with evidence of at least 75% contact hours or its excellent of continuing education related to his nurse practitioner specialty in the preceding five calendar years; 6. Has completed thirty hours of education in pharmacology for advanced nursing practice; 7. Has his/her employer provide the department with a description of his practice setting, job description, and a plan for supervision by a licensed physician; 8. Notifies the department of each change of employment to a new setting where he will function as an advanced practice registered nurse and will be exercising prescriptive and dispensing privileges. Any person who obtains a license pursuant to subsection of this section shall be eligible to renew such license annually provided he presents the department with evidence that he received at least fifteen contact hours, or its equivalent, eight hours of which shall be in pharmacology, of continuing education related to his nurse practitioner specialty in the preceding licensure year. An individual licensed pursuant to subsection of this subsection becomes eligible at any time for certification as a nurse practitioner by one of the national certifying bodies specified in subsection of this section, the individual should apply for certification, and upon certification so notify the department, and apply to be licensed as an advanced practice registered nurse in accordance with subsection of this section. A person who has received a license to this section should be known as an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse and no other person shall assume such title or use the letters or figures which indicated that person using the same is a licensed advance practice registered nurse. Reasons why I want to become a Registered NurseI think I want t o become a registered nurse is because I love working around people and I would love to help the sick that need someone there and also because I understand the way the people do feel cause I been in that atmosphere before and I know how the people feel and I would love to just be there for the patients. So I want to be there for them when ever they need something. Bibliography: